Re: DB2 / SQL Replicator ?? <<<<<<<
Date: 1996/01/08
Message-ID: <4cs1nr$56g_at_dub-news-svc-5.compuserve.com>#1/1
kbradley_at_us.oracle.com (Kirk Bradley) wrote:
>Since DRDA is based on APPC why do you say your stuff must have
Since perfomance varies widely depending on network setup and traffic,
number are hard to give.
Main point is to go with bulk processing instead of row processing,
where this is possible...
I can try to get numbers if you give me info / parameters about
concrete environment. My feeling is that no one can be truly
interested in well tuned marketing numbers (" there are lies, damned
lies and performance benchmarks... ;-)")
Regards, Martin
>better performance? got any numbers?
Another point would be to look at total times (extract / transport /
apply).
Since we *can* use high performance utilities for each of these phases
(depending on circumstances) we can be a lot faster than sql.
Example: Converting to the right numeric format for the atrget
database during extract on MVS, building page formats on the
mainframe, thus eliminating any load time, etc.
kallm_at_platinum.com or 100732.511_at_compuserve.com
http://www.platinum.com
Opinions are mine own, may be not PLATINUMs
Received on Mon Jan 08 1996 - 00:00:00 CET