Re: Hot backups vs. Offline Backups
Date: 1995/12/15
Message-ID: <4as2a1$1it_at_cisu2.jsc.nasa.gov>#1/1
>
> Re: Hot backups vs. Offline Backups
>
> jklaren_at_qualcomm.com (Jon Klaren)
> Thu, 14 Dec 1995 03:58:46 GMT
> QUALCOMM, Incorporated; San Diego, CA, USA
>
> Newsgroups:
> comp.databases.oracle
> References:
> <4a0g1p$62u_at_gaia.cc.gatech.edu>
>
> You may want to consider just a good application to work with your
> backup system to have a complete backup. If your system is like ours,
> shutting down the database is more problematic than the time it takes
> to mirror or backup the server. One package that I understand is on
> the market is St. Bernard's Open File Manager. It apparently works
> with all backup systems from ArcServe to Colorado, and will allow them
> to backup Oracle or any other file system even if there are users
> logged in and making changes to the files. We are going to be getting
> an evaluation copy inhouse and see how it works? You can contact them
> at www.stbernard.com or on compuserve at GO STBERNARD.
> badri_at_cc.gatech.edu (badri) wrote:
> >Hi:
> > We run Oracle Version 7.2.16.0 on Dynix/ptx 2.1. We currently
have
> >triple mirroring and shut the database down to back it up.
> > There was a discussion earlier about hot backups with efficient
> >striping. I am a newbie and would like to get expert opinion on the
same.
> >Has anyone had a positive/negative experience with hot backups? What
> >to I stand to loose? Is performance ok with it? We are also looking
at
> >migrating to Dynix/ptx v4.1. Has anybody experienced any version
> >incompatibility with it?
> >thanks a lot,
> >-Badri
Remember, without concurrency, you really don't have much of an RDBMS!
_ _ _ _ __ : Paul Roberts |_ |_| | | : Programmer / Analyst _| | | _|_ |__ : proberts_at_isc901.jsc.nasa.gov
Science Applications International Corporation
(An employee-owned company)
The opinions expressed are my own, and not necessarily the views of SAIC, NASA, or the U.S. government. Received on Fri Dec 15 1995 - 00:00:00 CET