Re: Which MsWindows TCP/IP is better for Oracle SQL*NET for TCP/IP

From: Dennis M. Gray <dmgray_at_fareast.com.au>
Date: 1995/12/06
Message-ID: <4a3tks$ao4_at_gidora.kralizec.net.au>#1/1

Steve Harville <76163.3553_at_compuserve.com> wrote:

>>I wonder if anybody has experience with or already done evaluation of
>>MsWindows TCP/IP stacks (e.g. Trumpet, Metmanage, ... .. products) for
>>Oracle SQL*NET for TCP/IP. Which one do you think is better and works
>>smoothly or at least you are satisfied with?
>>
>
>The tcpip stack in win95 and windows nt works fine for us.
>

What about Trumpet Winsock? My idea is to have Trumpet running under Windows 3.11 with an Oracle server on a Linux machine. I have a long way to go on getting the server up and running so there is no hurry on this but would appreciate comments. Received on Wed Dec 06 1995 - 00:00:00 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Paul B. Golden: "Re: NULL values or Zero in numeric fields?"
Previous message: Karla Johnson: "Re: Suppress Runform Option Page"
Maybe reply: David-Michael Lincke: "Re: Which MsWindows TCP/IP is better for Oracle SQL*NET for TCP/IP"
Maybe reply: MasterG: "Re: Which MsWindows TCP/IP is better for Oracle SQL*NET for TCP/IP"
Maybe reply: ccoronel_at_: "Re: Which MsWindows TCP/IP is better for Oracle SQL*NET for TCP/IP"
Maybe reply: Dennis M. Gray: "Re: Which MsWindows TCP/IP is better for Oracle SQL*NET for TCP/IP"
Maybe reply: Dennis M. Gray: "Re: Which MsWindows TCP/IP is better for Oracle SQL*NET for TCP/IP"
Maybe reply: Prentice Kinser: "Re: Which MsWindows TCP/IP is better for Oracle SQL*NET for TCP/IP"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message