Why LONG field limit??

From: Michael Irene <multipro_at_ix.netcom.com>
Date: 1995/12/03
Message-ID: <49t3h3$n5v_at_ixnews7.ix.netcom.com>#1/1

I'm in the middle of converting a MS Access database to Oracle. Have already encountered a stumbling block: Oracle only allows one LONG field per table. Since I have a table that contains 15 LONG type equivilents (memo fields), I must now create 15 additional tables and alter all my queries accordingly. Just curious, does anyone know why Oracle imposes this limit? Are there any plans to change this limit in upcoming releases? Received on Sun Dec 03 1995 - 00:00:00 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: W. van der Deijl: "Re: Need Help with PO7 for Win95. Please."
Previous message: NAGAPPAN: "Re: Power Object Object oriented?"
Maybe reply: Alexander V. Lukyanov: "Re: Why LONG field limit??"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message