** SURVEY--Designer/2000 ...please reply
Date: 1995/11/28
Message-ID: <49fnue$i03_at_news.bu.edu>#1/1
I'm a graduate student in MIS department at Boston University. Currently, we are doing a research on evaluation of CASE tools. Because it is one of the most potential CASE available today, Designer/2000 was among those that we selected. In order to get the most accurate result, we need quite a number of inputs from users of Designer/2000. We found this group a good place to collect the data. Please donate your valuable time responding the following survey.
This survey has two parts. The first part is 1-5 feature rating questions designed specifically for Designer/2000. The second part is verbal question applicable to both Designer/2000 and Developer/2000. If you also familiar with Developer/2000, please include it in your comment.
This survey seems to be very long at first, but it is straight forward and should take you not more than 5 minutes. Any response by email or posting in this group would be appreciate.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Chaiwat
ohh_at_bu.edu
PART I: Please rate the following features of Designer/2000 in 1-5 scale.
Additional comments are welcome.
OVERALL SYSTEM Poor Excellent Installation Process 1 2 3 4 5 Manual 1 2 3 4 5 Context Sensitive Help 1 2 3 4 5 User Interface 1 2 3 4 5 Time to Learn (full time) 1) 1-2 days 2) 3-7 days 3) 2-3 weeks 4) 1 month or more Customer Service 1 2 3 4 5 Overall Satisfaction 1 2 3 4 5 REPOSITORY Coordination/Communication Among 1 2 3 4 5 N/A Teem Members Reusability Across Multiple Projects 1 2 3 4 5 N/A Integration Among Multiple Repositories 1 2 3 4 5 N/A Integration with 3rd Party Tools 1 2 3 4 5 N/A ANALYSIS TOOLS Business Process Reengineering 1 2 3 4 5 N/A Reverse Engineering 1 2 3 4 5 N/A Capability to Help Analysis 1 2 3 4 5 N/A MODELERS Entity Relationship Diagrammer 1 2 3 4 5 N/A Data Flow Modeler 1 2 3 4 5 N/A DESIGN TOOLS Data Diagrammer 1 2 3 4 5 N/A Database Design Wizard 1 2 3 4 5 N/A Application Design Wizard 1 2 3 4 5 N/A CODE GENERATORS Quality of Client Applications Generated 1 2 3 4 5 N/A Need to Modify Generated Code Yes No N/A Flexibility for Design Change 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
PART II: Please answer the following questions.
- What CASE tools have you used before?
- Why did you decide to use Designer/2000 (and/or Developer/2000)?
- Approximately by how many percents of productivity do you gain by
using Designer/2000 (and/or Developer/2000) when compared to:
- not using CASE tool?
- using other CASE tools (please specify)?
- What features of the system that you think are most useful?
- What features of the system that you think are less useful?
- What features that you think the system should have but it doesn't? Do you have any recommendations?
- What serious bugs did you find?