Re: Splitting this newsgroup ?

From: Robert Goodwin <robert.goodwin_at_msfc.nasa.gov>
Date: 1995/11/20
Message-ID: <48qt3b$ldr_at_hammer.msfc.nasa.gov>#1/1


Might want to include a group exclusively for job opportunities, since there seem to be so many here.

  • Robert

In article <dbmooreDI66uq.LFo_at_netcom.com>,

   dbmoore_at_netcom.com (Dennis Moore) wrote:
>I totally agree. There are so many Tools postings that I want to read
>(and even some I want to answer ;-) but it takes so long to go through
>the over 200 postings that go up per day now! Given the rapid new
>releases of our tools, I would recommend not having cdetools and
>dev2000 groups but having an RDBMS group, a TOOLS group, a WEB group,
>a FINANCIALS group, and a MISC group. Who wants to start the process?
>
>In article <30ABB8FE.5443_at_oslonett.no> Steinar Gravdal <sgravdal_at_oslonett.no>
 writes:
>>Hi !
>>
>>Wouldn't it be a great idea to split this newsgroup into some
>>smaller branches ? Oracle products are increasing very
>>fast in numbers, and I have prolems following this
>>group (among many others). I have some suggestions :
>>
>>comp.databases.oracle.dba
>>comp.databases.oracle.financials
>>comp.databases.oracle.cdetools
>>comp.databases.oracle.dev2000
>>comp.databases.oracle.po7
>>
>>and so on ....
>>
>>Anyone agree ?
>>
>>
>>Steinar
>>
>>--
>>=========================================================
>>E-mail : sgravdal_at_oslonett.no
>>WWW : http://www.oslonett.no/~sgravdal
>>Phone : 62 32 25 30
>>GSM : 90 74 32 28
>
>
Received on Mon Nov 20 1995 - 00:00:00 CET

Original text of this message