Re: Very Large Oracle Database Backup (200 Gbytes)
Date: 1995/09/26
Message-ID: <449913$9sr_at_scitsc.wlv.ac.uk>#1/1
byron_at_sfsu.edu writes:
>Vincent Catry <catry_at_grenoble.hp.com> wrote:
>>Hello
>>Does anyone has experience in backuping big Oracle database
>>(200 Gigbytes) ? I was thinking of doing one full & offline backup
>>on saturday night on many different tape devices in parallel and
>>backup archive log files continuously during the week for the
>>incremental. But I am afraid of the recovery time of those archive
>>log files.
>>Any feedback ?
>>Thanks
>>catry_at_grenoble.hp.com
>Ours is not quite so large (only 40GB - about 70 GB next year). We
>take an offline backup (about 2 hours on 3480 media; compressed;
>parallel dumps on multiple drives) during the weekend mainly to get
>the control files and database in for a disaster recovery set. We use
>hotbackup and archive logs during the week for incrementals. You are
>right about the recovery time concern - it takes an enormous amount of
>time for Oracle to unscramble itself even from just a "basic" crash.
>Without the combination of on-line archive logs and near-on-line tape
>logs - a tape only solution would be ridiculous.
>I noticed your org is hp.com. We are considering HP for specialty
>database servers. Any suggestions for how many tape drives for a 100+
>GB database? I was thinking 3490E (if even possible) or DLT. What is
>your experience on the DLT or other recommendation for FAST tape
>systems for HP.
>Thanks.
>Byron
>byron_at_sfsu.edu
>Administrative Systems
-- ~)~. ~)~ _ _ |_ || || ||\ || || || \\ // (_/ / /') / (' / ) (_ | ) || || ||\\|| || || )X( Wolverhampton Polyversity ||__| || || \|| \\_// // \\ E_MAIL cm5585_at_scitsc.wlv.ac.uk UNIX++Received on Tue Sep 26 1995 - 00:00:00 CET