Re: SGA Sizing problem

From: Parris Geiser <parris_at_walleye.esp.bellcore.com>
Date: 1995/08/11
Message-ID: <40gngt$fn_at_athos.cc.bellcore.com>#1/1


Thomas,

	Thanks for your reply.
	Yes the scripts that you provide do give what ORACLE thinks
	is the size of the SGA. What I'm confused about is that the
	UNIX ipcs -b -m command value is such a different number.
	Perhaps ipcs is not giving what I thought or ...???
		Parris


Thomas J Kyte (tkyte_at_us.oracle.com) wrote:
> parris_at_walleye.esp.bellcore.com (Parris Geiser) wrote:
 

> >Running 7.1.6 on HP-UX.
 

> >db_block_buffers = 100
> >shared_pool = 3,500,000
> >log_buffer = 16,384
> >block_size = 2048.
 

> >So, the SGA should be: 3,721,184.
> >But when I do an ipcs -b -m
> >I get 4,892,680.
 

> >The question is: why such a large descrepency?????
> > Thanks.
 

> Run the following two queries in your database, they will show you exactly how
> the sga is being allocated and what it is being used for.

> compute sum of Value on report
> break on report
> column value format 999,999,999
> select * from v$sga;

> column bytes format 999,999,999
> compute sum of bytes on report
> select *
> from v$sgastat;

> The variables you listed have by far the largest effect on the SGA size but they
> are not the only things up there.
 

> Hope this helps...
 

> Thomas Kyte
> tkyte_at_us.oracle.com
> Oracle Government
Received on Fri Aug 11 1995 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message