Re: Splitting comp.databases.oracle ?

From: Tony Jambu <aaj_at_phantom.telecom.com.au>
Date: 1995/06/26
Message-ID: <3skvih$sv5_at_newsserver.trl.OZ.AU>#1/1


In article <3skv5g$rlo_at_newsserver.trl.OZ.AU>, aaj_at_phantom.telecom.com.au (Tony Jambu) writes:
> I am posting this on behalf of Carlos Netto cnetto_at_cps.softex.br who is
> having trouble with his Newsserver.
.
.
> comp.databases.oracle.dev2000 (instead of CASE)
> comp.databases.oracle.des2000 (instead of CDE or Tools)

I think the group is appropriate but I am afraid that Oracle will change the name of the product infuture as they always do.

> comp.databases.oracle.rdbms (instead of dba)

Being a DBA, I prefer the DBA group.

> comp.databases.oracle.unix (great idea)
 

> comp.databases.oracle.winnt
> comp.databases.oracle.netware

I personally don't think that the amount of posting warrant the creation of these 2 groups above but at least it will separate the posting out more.

ta
tony

-- 
 _____       ________ / ___ |Tony Jambu, Database Consultant
  /_  _        /_ __ /      |Wizard Consulting,Aust (ACN 065934778)
 /(_)/ )(_/ \_/(///(/_)/_(  |CIS: 100250.2003_at_compuserve.com FAX: +61-3-4163559
 \_______/                  |EMAIL:TJambu_at_wizard.com.au PHONE: +61-3-4122905
Received on Mon Jun 26 1995 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message