Re: Warning about null and open question to Oracle

From: Barberl <barberl_at_aol.com>
Date: 1995/06/26
Message-ID: <3smb49$r1j_at_newsbf02.news.aol.com>#1/1

If Oracle's treatment of nulls is consistent with pure math, then why does a boolean have 3 possible values: true,false, and null. There is no math that supports such an idiotic treatment. Received on Mon Jun 26 1995 - 00:00:00 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tony Jambu: "Re: Splitting comp.databases.oracle ?"
Previous message: Helge Petersen: "Re: Creating new database on NT server"
In reply to: Mike Kohut, NorthwesTel: "Re: Warning about null and open question to Oracle"
Next in thread: Don Smith: "Re: Warning about null and open question to Oracle"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message