Re: PB 4.0 vs Oracle Forms
Date: 23 Mar 1995 08:29:08 GMT
Message-ID: <3krbgl$ni_at_ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>
I don't see anything wrong with an Oracle employee getting excited over their own products. I imagine that PowerSoft employees are just as excited over their product.
In <3kq00l$1o4_at_xenon.brooks.af.mil> Steve Downs <downs_at_oehl.brooks.af.mil> writes:
>
>dbmoore_at_netcom.com (Dennis Moore) wrote:
>>
>> In article <3k6nfb$21m_at_bruce.uncg.edu> j_doan_at_turing.uncg.edu (John .
Doan) writes:
>> >This is urgent.
>> >I need more information about why I should choose PB over Forms or
vice
>> >versa. Please respond soon. Thank you.
>>
>> support, etc. And with the new "no runtime fee" pricing and "on-time
delivery
>> of ports like Macintosh, Motif, and character mode," Developer/2000
blows the
>> doors off of PB4.
>>
>
>Wow, but tell me, is it still as bloated and buggy as 4.0 was? Or
>will this one actually run after you've completed the seventy-disk
>installation process?
>
>If so, perhaps Oracle should be congratulated on finally making par.
>Powersoft has been there for awhile, and is a less arrogant,
>more customer-oriented company.
>
>As far as holy wars go, if Oracle keeps up their advertising in this
>group, maybe we should rename it comp.soft-sys.pb-jihaad.
>
>Steve
>
>"I speak for myself, not my employer."
>
Received on Thu Mar 23 1995 - 09:29:08 CET