Re: Designer/2000 & Developer/2000
Date: 20 Mar 1995 18:17:38 GMT
Message-ID: <3kkgs2$a0b_at_clarknet.clark.net>
Michael Kranzdorf (mikek_at_krt.com) wrote:
: In article <dbmooreD5nG9J.4sq_at_netcom.com>, dbmoore_at_netcom.com (Dennis
: Moore) wrote:
: "Once Again Mac Users Get the Shaft"
: I think this is a cruel and unusual policy and I really hope you
: reconsider it. Just because you build the product on Windows and then port
: it, it's not fair to simply yank out the "porting cost" as extraneous to
: the product development. You know all along that you're building
: cross-platform tools. Perhaps If you restructured your development process
: to focus on that from the start, it wouldn't be so expensive.
: You're giving up a huge amount of money by not charging for Windows
: runtimes. Surely the amount you'll get out of the other platforms is not
: worth the bad will it promotes. I already have to wait months to start
: using "the way cool really great stop using 4.0 now" Forms 4.5 for Mac.
: Now you want me to pay extra for it? While Windows users get it earlier
: and cheaper? They get 2 pluses and I get 2 minuses. This all leaves a bad
: taste in my mouth.
: Mike Kranzdorf mikek_at_krt.com
-- Mike, Your not getting the shaft as bad as you think. We have been using Forms 4.5 for windows since January. It is extremely buggie and GPX are commonplace. I will NEVER recommend this product. I will use it at the client's expense but not my own. Hopefully, by the time you get the product, if you still want it, it will have a lot of the bugs worked out. Therefore, the shaft will be there with one less nodule to hurt you. Thanks, Bud Michels bmichels_at_clark.net (301)598-7416Received on Mon Mar 20 1995 - 19:17:38 CET