This group is too large.....the story continues
Date: 4 Feb 1995 04:08:59 GMT
Message-ID: <3guukr$70d_at_classic.iinet.com.au>
rpalanov_at_ix.netcom.com mailled :
>We've been talking about breaking it up for a long time now. Several
>topics were suggested. What does it take to do it - anyone. Where do we >start, who should do it etc. Rita P.
iain posted :
>It's a sensible division of the field. But we could do a lot, without
>splitting the group, if people would use the subject lines of their
>postings to indicate divisions of this sort - also platform.
This is also good a good idea, BUT :-) voluntry standards only work if i) everyone knows about them; ii) everyone uses them. The know about them part would be OK if they where put in a Posting FAQ that was short and only about posting. Everyone using them...well it might work and it might get you better returns to posts if a subject line like : "DBA < Whats the best way to backup my database"; was used. Every DBA would lock onto the DBA part straight away and you would be trying to bring your mail server back up for days under the load of returns.
This example is not the best, but the idea is there. The "Keys"
would need to be short and at the front. What "Keys" do you think we
need?
How about these ?
ORACLE * Suggestions to Oracle PRODUCTS * Products/Services Informationor
PROD
PROD-FORMS * Product Info on Forms PROD-REPORTS * Product info on Reports etc..... DBA * DBA issues CASE * Data Models/Design/CASE?or
DESIGN
DEV * Developement/Programming DEV-SQL * SQL/syntax issues DEV-FORMS * Forms Developement/Programming DEV-REPORTS * Reports Developement/Programmingetc...
This list is too long, but the use of some key would help.
Andrew Received on Sat Feb 04 1995 - 05:08:59 CET