Re: Hardware for 200GB+ DB ?
Date: 19 Dec 1994 14:48:41 GMT
Message-ID: <3d46g9$856_at_mrnews.mro.dec.com>
In article <3d01k4$2pm_at_fido.asd.sgi.com>, darrylr_at_wombat.engr.sgi.com (Darryl Ramm) writes:
|>In article <singerap.43.000D72EF_at_powergrid.electriciti.com>,
|>Paul Singer <singerap_at_powergrid.electriciti.com> wrote:
|>>In article <5Y00H0C.smith117_at_delphi.com> smith117_at_delphi.com writes:
|>>>From: smith117_at_delphi.com
|>>>Subject: Re: Hardware for 200GB+ DB ?
|>>>If you are looking for the highest capacity technology,
|>>>SGI or DEC have the best stuff today.
|>
|>Thanks for the SGI vote, however I might dispute DEC though and
|>substitute Sequent or a few other vendors depending on what the CPU,
|>I/O and memory capcity requrements where. DEC's OSF/1 scalability is
|>just awfull and it's not clear they are doing much to fix it....
SAY WHAT ?
What real life personal experience makes you say that OSF/1 scalability
is 'just awfull' ??
On SPECrate benchmarks DEC OSF/1 systems scale up approx. linearly up to
6 processors (which is the max nbr of processors for now, new announcements =
biz.dec.announce, watch it).
Also the DEC 7750 (5 cpus) won the AIM (tm) hot iron award as the best
AIM multi-user benchmark performer they had so far (5-cpu scaling > 85%, show
me better scaling for AIM benchmarks)
A DEC 7760 will perform in excess of 1000 tps, using ONLY 6 cpus, more than 50%
of the result your system achieves with 31 (!!!) cpus.
So in the future pls refrain from bashing other vendors, in my opinion it's bad style.
rgds
MatthiasD.
DEC Digital Equipment Corporation AG, Switzerland Matthias Dolder
Internet: matthias_at_zuo.dec.com
..the opinions expressed in this entry are mine, only mine, not Digital's.... Received on Mon Dec 19 1994 - 15:48:41 CET