Re: Looking for suggestion on security

From: Lawrence James <James.Lawrence_at_epamail.epa.gov>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 1994 20:07:29 GMT
Message-ID: <James.Lawrence.12.000F206B_at_epamail.epa.gov>


In article <37racn$i8d_at_mailer.fsu.edu> raz_at_garfield.freac.fsu.edu (ISPA System Admin.) writes:
>From: raz_at_garfield.freac.fsu.edu (ISPA System Admin.)
>Subject: Looking for suggestion on security
>Date: 16 Oct 1994 13:38:31 GMT

> I'm looking for suggestions regarding security in a multi-user
>client-server environment. We run Oracle 7 on UnixWare as the server and
>a client front end for MS Windows and Macintosh. We're using SQL*Net v2
>as well as ODBC to access the remote database on a TCP/IP network.
>
> The application keeps track of a lot different budgets for research
>projects. The are a lot of transactions that affect the budgets such as
>budget allocations, money spend on equipment, appointments, etc, etc...
 

> The number of budgets and daily transactions against each budget is
>large enough that we assign several budgets to different fiscal assistants
>to keep them up to date.
 

> We are constantly creating reports against this database to see who
>is doing what kind research. The money that they are bringing in. How
>much money is spend on equipment, payroll, estimates on future funding
>and expenditures, etc, etc...
 

> Currently, the schema for the application is maintained under one
>Oracle user. This simplifies the process of creating the reports
>mentioned above. It also simplifies the problem of the end of year closing
>backup. We just create another user (i.e. fy93, fy94, etc) in the database
>and backup the data there in case it needs to be referenced in real time.
 

> The problem of having only one DB user and several fiscal assistants
>log in under the same user, I feel, is a security risk. It also makes it
>hard to keep logs on the transactions performed by each fiscal assistant
>since to the database they all appear to be the same user. So what I would
>like to do is have each fiscal assistant log in under his/her own user name
>while still maintaining the database schema under one DB user. The are
>two ways we can do this, 1) in addition to the main database user, we
>create a user for each fiscal assistant in the database. The user won't
>have any tables but synonyms of the main database schema. 2) Create an
>additional table on the main database schema of fiscal assistants. This
>table will contain, user names, passwords, assigned budgets, and
>applications each fiscal assistant can use. Then create a client server
>front end that will check this table to maintain security.
 

> Both solutions have their good points and bad. I'm wondering how
>other people have dealt with this problem. I'm interested in any ideas,
>comments or suggestions.
>

Use individual users. I makes things much easier when trying to do problem resolution. Nothing I hate worse than firing up SQLDBA and seeing 14 sessions for the same user and one of them is holding a lock. Received on Thu Oct 20 1994 - 21:07:29 CET

Original text of this message