Re: linux
From: Tim Bass <bass_at_cais.cais.com>
Date: 20 Oct 1994 03:48:27 GMT
Message-ID: <384pab$rd4_at_news.cais.com>
Date: 20 Oct 1994 03:48:27 GMT
Message-ID: <384pab$rd4_at_news.cais.com>
Tom Poindexter (tpoind_at_advtech.uswest.com) wrote:
: In article <782307109_at_f573.n115.z1.ftn> Michael Stowe <Michael.Stowe_at_f573.fido.chi.il.us> writes:
i
[ snip ]
: >couldn't charge for it, which would kind of defeat the purpose.)
: I don't think this is true. I'm aware of a few products being sold for : Linux (a commercial X server, for one.)
THere is not problem to sell Oracle on top of Linux. If the Linux source is modified ( the kernal ) then that source would have to be freely distributed.
Oracle specific code on top of linux belong to Oracle to profit from. Received on Thu Oct 20 1994 - 04:48:27 CET