Re: Oracle Installation Experiences
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 1994 17:08:40 GMT
Message-ID: <CxD6AG.MJJ_at_world.std.com>
output_at_netcom.com (Output Services) writes:
>Oh, dammit, I can't pass this up. I will no doubt get the "mainframe user
>go home" flame for this.
>In article <36cq4p$jq2_at_dcsun4.us.oracle.com> dhuet@DHUET-PC writes:
>>Oracle may not be pretty to install, but once you get past that, IT KICKS ASS!
>>David Huet
>Maybe. Compared to what? The Unix based stuff is a joke in the real world
>of legacy apps. As a rule, I agree, Oracle is better than other Unix
>data handling packages. Then again, Visicalc is better than other
>Apple II spreadsheets, but that doesn't say much either.
>For a true comparison in throughput, reliability, stability, bug-freeness,
>etc, set Oracle next to some big iron systems. We ran the same VSE
>software for six years without discovering one bug.
What kind of software did you run? Received on Sat Oct 08 1994 - 18:08:40 CET