Re: Oracle buying GUPTA SQLWindows?

From: PeterWong <you_at_somehost.somedomain>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 1994 03:45:26 GMT
Message-ID: <1994Aug2.034526.15852_at_hitech.po.my>


According to my news sources Oracle has no intention of taking over Gupta. Apparently, the purchase of Gupta stocks was a "temporary" and "strategic" move ie Oracle bought the stocks at around $7 to $12 and resold them at $13. Anyone else heard otherwise?

In article <1994Jul28.132628.1_at_cbr.hhcs.gov.au>, pihlab_at_cbr.hhcs.gov.au (Bruce Pihlamae) says:
>
>In article <199407271345.IAA15124_at_news.cs.utexas.edu>, dawson_at_vx8250.nwscc.sea06.navy.mil (Rick Dawson) writes:
>> The lastest issue of InfoWorld stated that Oracle might buy Gupta, the makers of
>> SQLWindows.
>
>I heard from one of my sources that the next release of SQL*Forms (4.5?)
>designer actually looks and works a lot like Gupta's product. I wonder if
>InfoWorld got their wires crossed when they heard how SQL*Forms was going
>to change.
>
>>
>> 1: What do you think the effects would be on Oracle?
>
>New technology to integrate into front end products ... will take a while.
>
>> 2: What do you think the effects would be on Gupta?
>
>If it's a two way share in technology then you may see Gupta become the
>supplier of all Oracle's front-end tools and they might be available for
>access to many other DBs.
>
>> 3: Would it change your development plans?
>
>No.
>
>> I haven't the foggiest idea what would happen. I am new to the Oracle world and
>> I bought SQLWindows to be the front end product. I intentionally bought the two
>> products from different companies for the insane idea that it might give me some
>> measure of database independence. Now Oracle and SQLWindows might be better
>> integrated. However, as it gets more tightly integrated with Oracle, would it
>> loose some of its flexibility in attaching to other vendor's databases? I don't
>> know. What are your opinions?
>
>SQL*Windows' biggest plus is that it WILL talk to almost anything. I think
>that would remain but the Oracle interface might be tweaked to give better
>compatibility though.
>
>
>> ****************************************************************************
>> A navy base in the middle of Indiana? * Jerry U. "Rick" Dawson
>> How do they get the ships there? * dawson_at_vx8250.nwscc.sea06.navy.mil
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>By truck but they really have to want to go there 8^}.
>
>> --- anonymous visitor *
>> ****************************************************************************
>>
>--
>
>Bruce... pihlab_at_cbr.hhcs.gov.au
>
>*******************************************************************
>* Bruce Pihlamae -- Database Administration *
>* Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health *
>* Canberra, ACT, Australia (W) 06-289-7056 *
>*=================================================================*
>* These are my own thoughts and opinions, few that I have. *
>*******************************************************************
>
>"The more complex the argument gets, the easier it is to refute."
>"Killing is wrong!" -- Trent 'The Uncatchable' Castanaveras
Received on Tue Aug 02 1994 - 05:45:26 CEST

Original text of this message