Re: ATEGRA NEEDS SQL RDBMS DEVELS FOR NATIONWIDE POSITIONS

bamon_at_ocvaxc.cc.oberlin.edu (Jennifer R. Amon) writes:
>> Idiot, you just wasted more bandwidth. If you don't have the guts to write
>> about these head-hunter posts, too bad. I do, so if you don't want to
>> "waste bandwidth" write me private mail, or maybe get a brain and write these
>> companies private mail.
>
>Personally, I'd rather look at 5 posts here than wade through 500 on
>misc.jobs.offered. Why is is so terrible for there to be a few job
>posts here if they are RDBMS related? I just don't understand that.

Because it wouldn't just stay at 5 posts. Pretty soon Gemini would be start automagically sending us postings every week. Then we would start geting DB2 job listings. And then every headhunter that has ever heard the word Database would start posting.

I'm afraid we are on a bit of a slippery slop here. While I dont entirely agree with Mr. Forgy's Umm Presentation I'm agraid I do have to agree with his basic premise - This is not the place to post job offerings.

As for createing a new group called databases.jobs I dont have a problem with that but your still going to have to worry about headhunters posting to this group because this is where the talent pool is. I know that if I was looking for people this is where I would want to post to.

Maybe it is time to talk about a moderated group.

-- 
Regards, 

Lee E. Parsons                  		
Systems Oracle DBA	 			lparsons_at_world.std.com