Re: >Oracle's future
From: Jack Love <jlove_at_ivrit.ra.itd.umich.edu>
Date: 22 Mar 1994 15:41:12 GMT
Message-ID: <2mn3ip$i32_at_lastactionhero.rs.itd.umich.edu>
Date: 22 Mar 1994 15:41:12 GMT
Message-ID: <2mn3ip$i32_at_lastactionhero.rs.itd.umich.edu>
In article <2mclel$j8g_at_juniper.almaden.ibm.com>,
P. Gainer <gainer_at_almaden.ibm.com> wrote:
>I would just like to point out several things:
> 1, DB2/6000 is faster than Oracle v7, if Oracle doesn't use discrete trans.
For some odd reason the folks around here can't seem to get DB2 to do many useful things, but Oracle7 is becoming increasingly popular.
> 2, Oracle v6 had 26 maintenance releases. Oracle v7, on AIX, has had 16
> maintenance releases already. Does that sound stable to you?
This is a cheap shot. Some manufacturers do the best they can to get bug fixes to their users. Others label the bugs "features."
"Just me--my employer swears off"
-- ________________________________________ Jack F. Love | Opinions expressed are mine alone. | (Unless you happen to agree.)Received on Tue Mar 22 1994 - 16:41:12 CET