Re: Gupta vs. Powerbuilder or VB
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1993 17:35:59 GMT
Message-ID: <Remo.Pennacchioli.27.000C99E5_at_Waterloo.NCR.COM>
In article <2dga1r$2j5_at_nova.umd.edu> cm325c34_at_nova.umd.edu (BIRZNIEKS--GUNTHER) writes:
>From: cm325c34_at_nova.umd.edu (BIRZNIEKS--GUNTHER)
>Subject: Re: Gupta vs. Powerbuilder or VB
>Date: 30 Nov 1993 15:22:19 -0500
>Paradox for Windows 4.5 is the upgrade to the 1.0... They upped the version so
>high because they are syncing the Windows product version numbers with the DOS
>version numbers so customers dont become confused. 4.5 has a LOT of bug fixes
>(Not that Borland admitted having bugs), some nice additional features in the
>OPAL language and some cosmetic changes (like some forms are easier to
>make)... Serial number constraints are gone.... And they have a SQL Link to
>Interbase, Oracle and SYBASE now that is integrated with the newer version of
>the ODAPI interface.
One of the main problems, from what I have read, with Paradox for Windows 1.0 was its speed. Compared to FoxPro for Windows, FoxPro would blow the doors of Paradox.
Does Paradox 4.5 for Windows offer better speed?
- remo --