Re: Raw Disk Partition vs. Unix File System (Oracle 6)
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 18:06:45 GMT
Message-ID: <CBx0zA.5pG_at_uunet!aadt>
In article <CBuyrL.DLo_at_cbnewse.cb.att.com>, cafe_at_cbnewse.cb.att.com (richard.dib) writes:
|> Hi There:
|>
|> We have a database in Oracle, and in order to speed it up we are considering
|> moving it into a raw disk partition (Unix).
|>
|> Here are my questions:
|>
|> - Does anybody have any experience with Oracle using a raw disk partitition
|> instead of the Unix file system? Could you share your experiences?
We are using raw partitions on HP 9000/8xx machines for several production systems. We have had no problems since moving to 7.0.12 of Oracle.
|>
|> - What are the benefits? Is the improvement in performance worth the work?
Our informal benchmarks showed a small increase over UNIX file systems.
|>
|> - How easy would it be to backup this database? We are currently using a shell
|> script to do this.
We use Oracle to backup the data.
|>
|> Thanks,
|>
|> Richard Dib
|> AT&T BL
|>
-- ================================================================ | Todd E. Richmond |"Kicking and screaming will the | | American Airlines | foolish be dragged into the | | Decision Technologies, Inc. | 21st century . . ." | | E-mail: todd_at_aadt.com | | | Voice: 817-967-1872 | | ================================================================Received on Tue Aug 17 1993 - 20:06:45 CEST