Re: Why use OCI when there's Pro*C ?

From: Martin Jarvis <smj_at_jbecpor.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1993 09:18:17 +0000
Message-ID: <C37DuH.5Mu_at_jbecpor.demon.co.uk>

Thanks for the info !!

I have had many responses, but no one appears to have considered the cost of supporting something which 'is like programming in assembler' (as someone said). For now I'll stick with the Pro*Stuff !!

-- 
Regards,

Martin



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

   Martin Jarvis                         |    John Brown E & C Ltd,
   smj_at_jbecpor.demon.co.uk               |    1 Buckingham Street, 
   Martin Jarvis /JBEC-Portsmouth, IT    |    Portsmouth, Hampshire, UK


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Mon Mar 01 1993 - 10:18:17 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Alex Novicky: "Re: non-DBA FAQ (first cut)"
Previous message: David Bath: "Re: PRO-C versus GCC (V2.0)"
Maybe reply: David Campbell: "Re: Why use OCI when there's Pro*C ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message