Re: What about the Oracle vs Sybase Ads?
Date: 16 Feb 93 14:22:08 PST
Message-ID: <1993Feb16.142209.25725_at_mic.ucla.edu>
In article <des.91_at_helix.nih.gov> des_at_helix.nih.gov (David E. Scheim) writes:
>capabilities in this arena from a vendor which up to now did not even offer
>optimization in its basic SQL queries. -- David Scheim
I agree with you though that there are lots of details yet to be worked out. Besides table size, in distributed database there are issues of machine speed, machine cost, link cost, link speed, reliability, load, etc.
Has anyone figured out why the analysts don't kill Sybase for renaming all their products Open- (Open Client, Open Server, Open Gateway) when in fact their product is the most proprietary, least open of all the major DBMS's ? (Sybase SQL is non-ANSI, their DBLIB is non-standard, they don't support embedded SQL well, FIPS Flaggers at all, and don't even have Cursors in the DBMS engine ?) Don't flame me that they're adding this stuff in System 10 since they renamed everything Open-* last year.
- Dan
Daniel Druker
Anderson Graduate School of Management at UCLA
| Dan Druker | | agsm mail : ddruker | | internet : ddruker_at_agsm.ucla.edu | | oracle*mail : unix:ddruker_at_agsm.ucla.edu | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: None. I'm a student now and I don't care what you think. Received on Tue Feb 16 1993 - 23:22:08 CET