Re: What about the Oracle vs Sybase Ads?

From: David E. Scheim <des_at_helix.nih.gov>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1993 13:51:19 GMT
Message-ID: <des.91_at_helix.nih.gov>


>To Sum things up:
 

>Sybase did a GREAT job of marketing and positioning their product. They looked
>at where their competition was, and tried to fill the niches that were
>left open (Fast Transactions, Techie oriented, great on small uniprocessor
>systems, Two Phase Commit, Ref Integrity). They innovated and coined a lot
>of industry buzzwords and really snowed over a lot of analysts (Finkelstein
>are you out there ??). Now the other vendors have implemented Sybase's
>unique features ...

Having worked with client-server systems, I can say that Sybase prospered because it set up the foundation for a client-server architecture that works. Their product is technically sound, providing the functionality such as stored procedures and triggers that permit deployment of real-life multiuser applications. Futhermore, my experience has been that a Sybase server can be installed in about half-an-hour and administered from two small manuals.

Distributed computing is a tough technical challenge to do well, requiring complex types of optimization to be practical in production. I must admit I am somewhat skeptical about the forthcoming production capabilities in this arena from a vendor which up to now did not even offer optimization in its basic SQL queries. -- David Scheim

/*********************************************************************/
/*                      --- David E. Scheim ---                      */
/* BITNET: none                                                      */
/* INTERNET: desl_at_helix.nih.gov          PHONE: 301 496-2194         */
/* CompuServe: 73750,3305                  FAX: 301 402-1065         */
/*                                                                   */
/* DISCLAIMER: These comments are offered to share knowledge based   */
/*   upon my personal views.  They do not represent the positions    */
/*   of my employer.                                                 */
/*********************************************************************/
Received on Tue Feb 16 1993 - 14:51:19 CET

Original text of this message