Re: RDA or RDA/OCM
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:33:04 -0700
On Jun 27, 5:40 pm, DA Morgan <damor..._at_psoug.org> wrote:
> jkel..._at_uga.edu wrote:
> > I'm setting up a test 10g r2 db on a Windows box and was going to
> > install RDA but see there is a good deal of info re Oracle
> > Configuration Mngr and RDA (MetaLink Doc ID: Note:314422.1 ) and was
> > wondering how others see this. I'm not expecting a "best practices",
> > but really was wondering just how others saw this. My feeling is
> > that, long term, OCM is going to be what Oracle wants, though it may
> > never be that stark. I had been planning to install RDA, but started
> > looking over the OCM stuff as well. This is hardly a major issue,
> > though it may become one here with time.
> > thanks for your thoughts on this,
> > --Joe
> RDA is a one minute installation ... unzip into any directory on the
> And if you want to be treated well by metalink it is mandatory.
> You'll spend more time reading my response than setting up the RDA tool.
> Best practice is to always have a current RDA zipped and ready to attach
> to an SR.
> Daniel A. Morgan
> University of Washington
> damor..._at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)
> Puget Sound Oracle Users Groupwww.psoug.org
I'll probably go with RDA. Is anyone even using OCM/RDA? --Joe Received on Thu Jun 28 2007 - 17:33:04 CEST