MI5 Persecution: Shoot to Kill 4/4/96 (12658)

From: <MI5Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk>
Date: 23 Jun 2007 03:16:53 GMT
Message-ID: <m07052303164465_at_4ax.com>



Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british From: jbaker_at_pobox.com (Jill Baker)
Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: How and Why Did it Start? Reply-To: jbaker_at_pobox.com
Date: Thu Apr 4 05:03:01 1996  

jbaker_at_pobox.com (Jill Baker) wrote:  

>bu765_at_torfree.net (Mike Corley) wrote:
 

>>Why would
>>the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more than fiv
 

>>years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because ...
 

>So why didn't they just shoot you dead?
>It would have been a lot cheaper.
 

Please make the effort to respond to this point Mike. It was a serious question.    

        Jill (my opinions are entirely my own, no-one else's)


Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: How and Why Did it Start? Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british References: <Dp5IAr.1EB.0.bloor_at_torfree.net> Organization: Toronto Free-Net
Distribution:    

jbaker_at_pobox.com (Jill Baker) wrote:  

>bu765_at_torfree.net (Mike Corley) wrote:
 

>>Why would
>>the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more
than fiv
>>years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because ...
 

>So why didn't they just shoot you dead?
>It would have been a lot cheaper.

I think there are two reasons nobody has taken physical action as opposed to verbal;  

  1. A lot of people "know". Perhaps you the reader might not know, but lots of people in the media etc do. Remember, I was born in the UK and lived there until a couple of years ago. I don't think these people would condone state-sponsored murder of someone who might be seen on a good day as one of their own.
  2. Rather than doind anything directly, they're going for spying, verbal harassment, media harassment, every form of persecution short of the physical. Because as soon as anything turns physical, the police become involved; and unless it turns physical, the police can shrug and say 'not our problem'.

So they persecute you and try to get you to react, either by hitting one of them (in which case I clearly find myself in the wrong as far as the police are concerned), or by trying to harm myself (in which case they can pretend they weren't responsible).  

It's a pretty unproductive form of harassment actually, because if you don't react then they're wasting they're time. Or perhaps they're just cheap bullies and trying to wreck someone's life, without any ulterior motive?

12658 Received on Sat Jun 23 2007 - 05:16:53 CEST

Original text of this message