MI5 Persecution: Dihydrocodeine 26/11/95 (6602)

From: <MI5Victim_at_mi5.gov.uk>
Date: 23 Jun 2007 02:29:32 GMT
Message-ID: <m07052302292462_at_4ax.com>



From: michaelm_at_easynet.co.uk (michaelm_at_easynet.co.uk) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.radio.uk Subject: Re: Britain's Shame (repost)
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 09:19:13 GMT
Organization: ------------
Lines: 89
Message-ID: <817374781.20251_at_michaelm.easynet.co.uk> References: <DIM34L.755.0.bloor_at_torfree.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: michaelm.easynet.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: michaelm.easynet.co.uk X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82

bu765_at_torfree.net (Mike Corblymee) wrote:

| In June 1990 a horrifying campaign of harassment was initiated in London by
| what are believed to be elements of the security services. The harassment has
| continued for over five years, starting from the broadcast and print media,
| and encompassing abuse through set-up situations and by people in public
| places. It has been brought to the attention of the police and they are aware
| what is happening, but are not taking any action to prevent it.

<whopping great snip of 884 lines>

corley, you puzzle me!

i've narrowed your possible motives down to one or more of the following:

  1. you work on behalf of the british government with a hidden agenda of furthering the largely right wing (most to hide) censorship brigade's cause, "a drug-crazed psycho posting dangerous nonsense - how very very sad - but in the public interest,we must act." draft internet (censorship) bills rolling off hm govt's banders at this very moment, I don't doubt it!
  2. you work for the daily mail which has started to feel the "internet pinch" as it suddenly clicks in the chronically adled minds of yet more and more of their readers - that shudder-inducing realisation that the entire editorial staff at the mail are scaremongering, imbecilic, blood-leeching , totalitarian twats - can any else sense a coordinated campaign on its way ??- "Mail urges (their) government to act - internet safety endangered by uncontrolled surfing lunatics - boys hands blown off by internet maniacs - net porn responsible for 392323rd rape " .net porn responsible for 392324th rape " .net porn responsible for 392325th rape " .net porn responsible for 392326th rape " .net porn responsible for 392327th rape " net porn responsible for 392328th rape " .net porn responsible for 392329th rape " <yawn> .net porn responsible for 392330th rape " .net porn responsible for 392331st rape " .net porn responsible for 392332nd rape " net porn responsible for 392333rd rape " <yawn> .net porn responsible for 392334th rape " .net porn responsible for 392335th rape " .net porn responsible for 392336th rape " .net porn responsible for 392337th rape " net porn responsible for 392338th rape " etcetera, straight from the old nag's mouth..

lee-potter (and english), take particular note.. (how ever you two common ********* managed to avoid encarceration for what was, quite evidently,wilful contempt of court in the regina v taylforth & knights case, is frankly beyond me.. those dreaded and now all too familiar words "endemic corruption" were muttered by at least one Q.C.

>3) you (at least) believe there's (some) substance to your claim(s) and you
>have a genuine axe to grind. If so, bloody well go for it, but scrape the
>heavy layer of steaming dung off the top (that's assuming you're even
>capable of distinguishing fantasy from reality.)

4) you (as an email address) are serving as some bizarre "educational" programme orchestrated by the psychiatric industry - ever keen to justify enforced electrical lobotomies, electroshock and dwugs .All poised for the echo? - "corley frigging well needs lobotomising"

5) you're just clinically insane with absolutely no comprehension or insight into the consequences you will possibly face as a result of repeatedly posting what, certainly on the face of it, looks like complete and utter bullshit.

6) you're some weirdo prankster(s) - probably a group of student psychiatrists having a cheap crack whilst high as kites on pilfered dihydrocodeine.

7) You are infact working for the ss yourself, gauging public awareness of the extent and methods of bugging - infinity transmitters, microwave surveillance devices, satellite tracking equipment, 'chipping' of black crims, say no more.

8) You're fuelling the central usenet administration committee, who, it is believed, are keen to see the introduction of a wide-reaching framework of self-created powers relating to posting cancellation. (see the 'son of RFC1036') my bet's on (5) - but just fuck off corley- irritate the lard-arsed canucks instead. The cia's financing of "professor" cameron's brain-washing experiments in montreal.. would be a good starting point ... or perhaps "professor" watts and his widely admired masterful double eye-jabbing trick - a couple of wallops with an icepick. such a waste of perfectly edible four year old hispanics !!!!.. Perhaps the old marylebone rd posse could fill us in with a few more facts on this one...?? You are all on the .net now ????? A very warm welcome :-) ... christmas rapidly approaching..
>business booming?? Do we all get a look in at flotation ??!!


From: Gulliver <kst2co_at_herts.ac.uk>
Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.radio.uk Subject: Re: Britain's Shame (repost)
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 18:25:32 +0000
Organization: University of Hertfordshire Lines: 12
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951126182156.16879B-100000_at_altair.herts.ac.uk> References: <DIM34L.755.0.bloor_at_torfree.net> <817343873snz_at_objmedia.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: altair.herts.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: <817343873snz_at_objmedia.demon.co.uk>

Actually, upon thinking about Mike's story it reminds me of someone I heard about who suffered from a persecution copmlex. He was an immigrant from some Eastern Bloc country who believed that 30 years after he emigrated the KGB were still after him. He would blame them if he had difficulty unlocking his car for instance (he reckoned they were putting something into the locks!).

Something is very wrong, probably in Mike's head but what the hell, loonies make life more fun!

--
Angus Gulliver

=======================================================

Subject: Castrate the depraved MI5 buggers now
Newsgroups: uk.misc
Organization: Toronto Free-Net


>Something is very wrong, probably in Mike's head but what the hell,
>loonies make life more fun!
Something is very wrong when the security services abandon their usual target of politicians and the well-known, to pursue the hitherto unknown nonentities such as myself.
>corley, you puzzle me!
Why? Because of my pathological truthfulness?
>3) you (at least) believe there's (some) substance to your claim(s) and you
>have a genuine axe to grind. If so, bloody well go for it, but scrape the
>heavy layer of steaming dung off the top (that's assuming you're even
>capable of distinguishing fantasy from reality.)
Bloody well go for it I will. I think the "standard spiel" is quite studded with facts actually. There's plenty of "meat" there if the appropriate people can be motivated to get their act together and pursue the case.
>my bet's on (5) - but just fuck off corley- irritate the lard-arsed canucks
>instead. The cia's financing of "professor" cameron's brain-washing
the lard-arsed canucks (?) are irritating me, but you don't want to hear about that
>business booming?? Do we all get a look in at flotation ??!!
6602
Received on Sat Jun 23 2007 - 04:29:32 CEST

Original text of this message