Re: Help!!
From: Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 21:31:09 +0200
Message-ID: <44AEB67D.9090402_at_gmail.com>
>>
>> A. Because it's contrary to the direction we normally read in.
>> Q. Why is top-posting so bad, then?
>> A. Top-posting.
>> Q. What's the biggest problem with readability on the Net?
>>
> You almost got me there!!!!!!!!!!! ;-) >
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 21:31:09 +0200
Message-ID: <44AEB67D.9090402_at_gmail.com>
GuessWho schreef:
> "gazzag" <gareth_at_jamms.org> wrote in message
>>
>> A. Because it's contrary to the direction we normally read in.
>> Q. Why is top-posting so bad, then?
>> A. Top-posting.
>> Q. What's the biggest problem with readability on the Net?
>>
> You almost got me there!!!!!!!!!!! ;-) >
Quoting is another problem. Usually one responds with only
the relevant data of the original message - all the rest
[Quoted] is snipped - some people adhere to the cistom of indicating
something actually was
[snipped]
by using the above (or {deletia})
-- Regards, Frank van Bortel Top-posting is one way to shut me up...Received on Fri Jul 07 2006 - 21:31:09 CEST