Re: Code in the database or middle tier (the CLR controversy)

From: JRStern <jxstern_at_bogus.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:57:08 -0700
Message-ID: <5lps9190n65mc59r1b7dn74luur3dj18hq_at_4ax.com>


[Quoted] [Quoted] On 1 Jun 2005 03:28:41 -0700, SAN3141_at_netscape.net wrote:
>There doesn't seem to be consensus about when to put code in the
>database or in the middle tier. There was a long discussion about this
>in an Oracle newsgroup (message ID:
>ULcQb.466$KU5.37_at_nwrddc02.gnilink.net).

Quite.

[Quoted] Generally, the bulk of such discussion is between people who know only one tier and are trying to use it for everything.

>IBM DB2 and Oracle are doing the same thing with the .NET CLR. Is this
>a non-issue or are all three companies misguided?

[Quoted] It's nice to have the option, but like with any power tool, if you don't know what it's for or how to use it, you may hurt yourself and others.

One can indeed have long discussions about the architectural issues in theory and practice, but overall, I'd say it's a two steps forward, one step back. That nets (sic) out to a good thing.

Josh Received on Thu Jun 02 2005 - 03:57:08 CEST

Original text of this message