Re: Code in the database or middle tier (the CLR controversy)

From: Raymond D'Anjou <rdanjou_at_savantsoftNOSPAM.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:43:18 -0400
Message-ID: <eb105GuZFHA.3712_at_TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>


[Quoted] This is "dead" technology.
http://www.psm.qc.ca/

"Paul" <paulsnewsgroups_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:qi1s91d14dlqicorvk633j7r196ngjv8d1_at_4ax.com...
>
> "--CELKO--" <jcelko212_at_earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>>What they should have done is implement the SQL/PSM and Standard
>>trigger syntax as a replacement for T-SQL.
>
>
> PSM?
>
> Pacific Sintered Metals (PSM)?
> SQL stored procedures/ PSM for Daffodil DB?
> Persistent Security Model?
>
>
> I did Google and got lots of stuff, but what do *_you_* mean by PSM
> (or is it a female complaint 8-) )
>
>
> Paul...
>
>
>
> --
>
> plinehan __at__ yahoo __dot__ __com__
>
> XP Pro, SP 2,
>
> Oracle, 9.2.0.1.0 (Enterprise Ed.)
> Interbase 6.0.2.0;
>
> When asking database related questions, please give other posters
> some clues, like operating system, version of db being used and DDL.
> The exact text and/or number of error messages is useful (!= "it didn't
> work!").
> Thanks.
>
> Furthermore, As a courtesy to those who spend
> time analysing and attempting to help, please
> do not top post.
Received on Wed Jun 01 2005 - 21:43:18 CEST

Original text of this message