Re: REe: OMLET: The Ultimate Oracle Monitoring Tool

From: Paul Drake <bdbafh_at_gmail.com>
Date: 13 Jul 2004 23:03:26 -0700
Message-ID: <910046b4.0407132203.55edfa31_at_posting.google.com>


joel-garry_at_home.com (Joel Garry) wrote in message news:<91884734.0407131308.4cd0b6ac_at_posting.google.com>...
> Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam> wrote in message news:<40f3bcae$0$18672$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au>...
> > Ed prochak apparently said,on my timestamp of 13/07/2004 5:22 AM:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > OFF TOPIC. and just putting RE in front of the subject DOESN't make it a reply.
> > >
> > > Boy, do you like **ssing people off or what?
> >
> > the question is: do the REAL omlet people KNOW that this arsehole is
> > posting this spam, repeatedly?
>
> Maybe the whole product is some CS kiddie at UOP in Jordan who will
> spend many years without actually graduating, until he comes to the
> inescapable logical conclusion that he must kill his advisor with a
> hammer.
>
> Hey, it wouldn't be the first time.
>
> jg

that <explitive> killfile resident is the poster CHILD for this site:

http://www.abuselog.org/

Iowa Internet Annoyance Logging Protocol

(he/she, he|she, NAN, divisor=0) is an annoyance, nothing more.

I have not replied on any of that poster's trash, instead pursued it via the administrative channels, as well as the other recent cross-posting spam that has caused participation (IMHO) in this newsgroup to diminish.

the thing is, I enjoy reading good trolls (browsing at -1 on Slashdot).
that poster is not even a troll.
his posts are simply killfile fodder and should not be responded to.

that is all.

-bdbafh Received on Wed Jul 14 2004 - 08:03:26 CEST

Original text of this message