Re: SQL*Plus replacement available - SPAM SPAM SPAM
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 17:21:01 +0200
Message-ID: <c9q40u$ia9$1_at_nntp.fujitsu-siemens.com>
"Open Wound" <openwound5000_at_aol.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:e33ccdb5.0406040712.5eaa2a38_at_posting.google.com...
> Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:<1086332234.118414_at_yasure>...
> >
> > I just tallied up the responses to your post and my calling it spam.
> > So far not one person, other than you, feels your post was anything
> > other than cheap sleazy self-promotion.
> >
>
> I use freeware and I found the program useful. Making freeware is a
> community service..
>
> > And you, like all of the other spammers, can't come up with a single
> > reason why posting in the designated group would be a hardship ....
> >
>
> Does anybody ever read the "designated group"? I don't.
Exactly. So, if we show by our reading behavior that we are
not interested in what you want to advertise you simply ignore
what we tell you and push it on us harder, right?
Volker Received on Fri Jun 04 2004 - 17:21:01 CEST