Re: SQL*Plus replacement available - SPAM SPAM SPAM
Date: 4 Jun 2004 08:12:47 -0700
Message-ID: <e33ccdb5.0406040712.5eaa2a38_at_posting.google.com>
[Quoted] Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:<1086332234.118414_at_yasure>...
>
> I just tallied up the responses to your post and my calling it spam.
> So far not one person, other than you, feels your post was anything
> other than cheap sleazy self-promotion.
>
[Quoted] I use freeware and I found the program useful. Making freeware is a community service..
> And you, like all of the other spammers, can't come up with a single
> reason why posting in the designated group would be a hardship ....
>
Does anybody ever read the "designated group"? I don't.
> I've no doubt, like D Rolfe, you have had some hits on your web site.
> But if you aren't selling something ... why would you be counting? And
> as has been stated by others ... you've done yourself a huge amount of
> harm ... not one iota of good.
Not as far as I am concerned.. Received on Fri Jun 04 2004 - 17:12:47 CEST