Re: Does Oracle 10g make the Application Server (almost) insignificant?

From: Ron <support_at_dbainfopower.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:47:05 -0800
Message-ID: <OOSdnTBEx5ILnazdRVn-jg_at_comcast.com>


Hello Roel,

[Quoted]    Thanks a lot for getting the main point back.

   Unfortunately all other posts had purely personal nature and were not even trying to argue the original point.

Regards,

  Ron
  DBA Infopower
  http://www.dbainfopower.com
  Standard disclaimer:
http://www.dbainfopower.com/dbaip_advice_disclaimer.html

"rcf" <rcf_at_qqqwxs.nl> wrote in message news:4030a88c$0$572$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl...
> Could you guys please stop this childish behavior and stick to the
> topic, being the question whether or not Oracle10g will make the
> application layer less important.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Roel
>
> > On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:57:26 -0800, "Ron" <support_at_dbainfopower.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> But, no - this time you actually complimented me greatly by putting me
> >>together with Rich Niemics, Don Burlesons, and Mike Aults.
> >>
> >> They are the people who greatly contributed to creation of the oracle
> >>database industry as we know it today.
> >>
> >> Thousands and thousands DBAs read and study their books and papers.
> >>
> >> Thanks again.
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >
> >
> > Get a life. That was NOT intended as a compliment, and those thousands
> > and thousands DBAs would better throw those books away. NOW.
> >
> > If you try only once to implement the way DB tries to sample IO
> > statistics in the statspack schema, and try to give a *fair* judgement
> > of his 'solution', you will know why:
> > DB has a korn shell script set up a sqlplus session, insert *1*
> > record, and disconnect, for *every individual record*
> > Surely you are in the same league: you have been promoting and posting
> > crap solutions here from the day you started posting here.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
Received on Mon Feb 16 2004 - 18:47:05 CET

Original text of this message