Re: Is JDeveloper the continuation of Developer 2000?

This is what I wanted to know.

Thank you both.

Vicent Palasi

"mcstock" <mcstockspamplug_at_spamdamenquery.com> wrote in message news:<1OydnbEy-KdUCjSi4p2dnA_at_comcast.com>...
> Developer 2000 -- aka Developer 9i is based on PL/SQL and some very old
> technology, but has been rewritten in Java and allows Java extensions. It's
> a usable but clunky tool, and appears to have serious problems with the
> Report Builder (problems that 6i did not have). It is allegedly a 'live'
> product but is somewhat of an orphan. Of course, Oracle's tools strategy has
> been in a bit of disarray for about 5-6 years or more.
>
> JDeveloper was bought from Borland and is a totally different product than
> 'Developer'
>
> Hans did a good job of listing the product 'heritage'
>
> -- mcs
>
> "Victor Hernandez" <milleniumc_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:cfed2cda.0311051434.125aadcd_at_posting.google.com...
> > Hello everybody.
> >
> > I am a J2EE programmer. I know JDeveloper. But a customer of mine has
> > a large software written in Oracle Developer/2000 and wants this
> > software to be updated to the "current version of Developer 2000". (By
> > the way, I don't know anything about Developer 2000).
> >
> > I need to know what is the current version of Developer 2000. I have
> > been looking for Developer 2000 in the Oracle website but I haven't
> > found it at the Product page. It seems to me that Oracle is dropping
> > Developer 2000 to make Java its main programming language. But I have
> > found nothing that confirms that.
> >
> > Please, can you explain me what is the politics of Oracle about
> > Developer 2000? Is a "live" language or is it about to be discontinued
> > or deprecated? Which is its "current" version? What relationship has
> > with Java (JDeveloper)?
> >
> > Thank you for your help,
> >
> > Vicent Palasi
Received on Thu Nov 06 2003 - 21:18:03 CET