Re: forall ... execute immediate...
From: Volker Hetzer <volker.hetzer_at_ieee.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 15:32:48 +0200
Message-ID: <be3vm8$o9q$1_at_news.fujitsu-siemens.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 15:32:48 +0200
Message-ID: <be3vm8$o9q$1_at_news.fujitsu-siemens.com>
padderz wrote:
> Recommend you pass up FORALL in this case for a simple FOR .. LOOP
> through the array, where EXECUTE IMMEDIATE with a concatenated table
> name will work dandy with DROP or DELETE.
Ok, will do. :-(
Lots of Greetings and thanks!
Volker
-- While it is a known fact that programmers never make mistakes, it is still a good idea to humor the users by checking for errors at critical points in your program. -Robert D. Schneider, "Optimizing INFORMIX Applications"Received on Fri Jul 04 2003 - 15:32:48 CEST