Re: Email Validation

From: Scott Mattes <Scott_at_TheMattesFamily.ws>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 19:38:03 GMT
Message-ID: <viina.690$392.170152_at_news1.news.adelphia.net>


Hans,
  Well, I learn something new today. Thank you.

  I meant #5 and not #6. #5 reads "5. Must have at least 3 characters proceeding after the last _at_ symbol"

"Hans Forbrich" <forbrich_at_telusplanet.net> wrote in message news:3E9D9219.3B79B139_at_telusplanet.net...
> Scott Mattes wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't #2 be 'at least 6 chars a_at_b.com'?
>
> For internal systems & test systems, the rules allow 1 character after the
> final '.' Anyone who is country-based will likely use the 2-char country
code.
>
> >
> > And shouldn't #6 be 'at least 3 chars after the last period'?
>
> Nope. a_at_b.c is legit, if not particularily useful.
>
> >
> > And since the wording of #6 is 'off', shouldn't there be another check
that
> > there is at least one char
> > after the _at_ and before the . ?
>
> #6? Come again?
>
Received on Wed Apr 16 2003 - 21:38:03 CEST

Original text of this message