Re: The best performance tools??

From: Ivan Oss <ivano_at_comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 20:22:19 -0700
Message-ID: <jOecnSveKbhBhLejXTWcoA_at_comcast.com>


So, you liken purchase and/or use of such tools to jumping off a bridge? Why? I'll have to admit at this point I've got my market research hat on. Hopefully that doesn't put you off.

[Quoted] "DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_exesolutions.com> wrote in message news:3E25976A.45395E7C_at_exesolutions.com...
> Ivan Oss wrote:
>
> > Thanks Daniel,
> > I'm inclined to agree with your impression of tools on the market,
but
> > they still make a lot of money selling them, so there must be something
to
> > them. I never have touched most of the GUI tools available, even from
> > Oracle. Still, I have to wonder what I'm missing.
> >
> > "DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_exesolutions.com> wrote in message
> > news:3E244B67.CE093DEE_at_exesolutions.com...
> > > Ivan Oss wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> >
> >
> > <snipped because I can take a hint>
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> Bad argument from my standpoint. Lots of people use MS Access but that
doesn't
> make it a functional RDBMS. Was MS Word better than Word Perfect? Is Exel
> better than was Lotus 123.
>
> People buy things because PR, marketing, and advertising work.
>
> Buy things because YOU need them not because someone else is making a ton
of
> money selling them to you.
>
> Which BTW is not to say I don't think Qwest and others make good
serviceable
> products and I personally use them at times. But jumping off a bridge just
> because lots of other people do still doesn't make much sense to me.
>
> Daniel Morgan
>
Received on Sun Jan 19 2003 - 04:22:19 CET

Original text of this message