Re: JDeveloper - still not communicatign with SQL Server
From: Ravichandran Mahalingam <mravichandran_at_Hotmail.com>
Date: 10 Jan 2003 14:13:16 -0800
Message-ID: <286dc153.0301101413.1021e8a7_at_posting.google.com>
"dmz17" <dmz17_at_nospam.nowhere.com> wrote in message are some fragments of the world as I see them:
>
> 1. Borland's product is 2-3 times as expensive as Oracle's
>
> 2. With JDeveloper 903 I really believe that Oracle is getting the hang of
> a Java tool. It is not Eclipse though, but it has a lot of features I seem
> to be missing from Eclipse.
>
> 3. For Oracle DB developers, JDeveloper can't be beaten
>
> 4. For non-Oracle DB developers it is no better and no worse than any
> other Java tool.
>
> 5. So what, if Business Components for Java don't work well with non-Oracle
> databases? If you deal primarily with non-Oracle, don't use BC4J.
>
> 6. For J2EE stuff I believe JDeveloper is excellent. After all, the
> database stuff can be done by creating a connection and you will be doing
> hand coding anyway. They were trailing other vendors on J2EE standards
> compliance but now they have caught up.
>
> 7. Deployment to most popular platforms is a breeze. Not even necessary since
> a simple shell script job will deploy any EAR file automatically.
>
> 8. OC4J is built right into the product, so testing is simple. Stopping
> and starting OC4J is a matter of second(s). Try that with Websphere or
> WebLogic, by the way.
>
> I don't really see what else you would be using, honestly.
>
> I am not sure what you mean by 'communicating with SQLServer'. There are
> Java drivers to be had. And you are not suggesting a Microsoft tool to do
> Java development, right?
>
> Cheers,
>
> dmz17
Received on Fri Jan 10 2003 - 23:13:16 CET
Date: 10 Jan 2003 14:13:16 -0800
Message-ID: <286dc153.0301101413.1021e8a7_at_posting.google.com>
Dear DMZ,
Thanks for taking the time to respond to my queries. I had concluded on some of these based on my research. I will share my findings with my project manager.
I had sent her the url of this thread.
thanks once again for your input and have a nice weekend.
regards
Ravi.
"dmz17" <dmz17_at_nospam.nowhere.com> wrote in message are some fragments of the world as I see them:
>
> 1. Borland's product is 2-3 times as expensive as Oracle's
>
> 2. With JDeveloper 903 I really believe that Oracle is getting the hang of
> a Java tool. It is not Eclipse though, but it has a lot of features I seem
> to be missing from Eclipse.
>
> 3. For Oracle DB developers, JDeveloper can't be beaten
>
> 4. For non-Oracle DB developers it is no better and no worse than any
> other Java tool.
>
> 5. So what, if Business Components for Java don't work well with non-Oracle
> databases? If you deal primarily with non-Oracle, don't use BC4J.
>
> 6. For J2EE stuff I believe JDeveloper is excellent. After all, the
> database stuff can be done by creating a connection and you will be doing
> hand coding anyway. They were trailing other vendors on J2EE standards
> compliance but now they have caught up.
>
> 7. Deployment to most popular platforms is a breeze. Not even necessary since
> a simple shell script job will deploy any EAR file automatically.
>
> 8. OC4J is built right into the product, so testing is simple. Stopping
> and starting OC4J is a matter of second(s). Try that with Websphere or
> WebLogic, by the way.
>
> I don't really see what else you would be using, honestly.
>
> I am not sure what you mean by 'communicating with SQLServer'. There are
> Java drivers to be had. And you are not suggesting a Microsoft tool to do
> Java development, right?
>
> Cheers,
>
> dmz17
Received on Fri Jan 10 2003 - 23:13:16 CET