Re: A better SQL*Plus -- what features should it have?
From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_dial.pipex.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:58:25 -0000
Message-ID: <3dcc2575$0$8514$cc9e4d1f_at_news.dial.pipex.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 20:58:25 -0000
Message-ID: <3dcc2575$0$8514$cc9e4d1f_at_news.dial.pipex.com>
or indeed host naming unless i'm losing the plot
-- Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA Audit Commission UK ***************************************** Please include version and platform and SQL where applicable It makes life easier and increases the likelihood of a good answer ****************************************** "Van Messner" <vmessner_at_bestweb.net> wrote in message news:uso80ume3kuof9_at_corp.supernews.com...Received on Fri Nov 08 2002 - 21:58:25 CET
> If you don't like having many tnsnames.oras and trying to keep them all in
> sync, take a look at Oracle's LDAP solution - it's quite nice.
>
>
> "Daniel Morgan" <dmorgan_at_exesolutions.com> wrote in message
> news:3DCBE894.A5B7715A_at_exesolutions.com...
> > Comments interspersed below.
> >
> > Matthias Rogel wrote:
> >
> > > this gains me:
> > >
> > > 1. I don't have to go to each client machine and look if their
> > > tnsnames.ora is set up correctly
> >
> > You don't have to now if you configure the environment variable
TNS_ADMIN
> to point to a common location.
> >
> > <balance of thread snipped>
> >
> > Daniel Morgan
> >
>
>