Re: SQL Backtrack for Oracle vs. RMAN

you are paying to work with crap ???
instead of using the right tools , aah you are on NT

I will sell you my tool , just 555 mouseclicks per day and everything will be fine, no learning necessary just clicking

"Wormie" <ordeith_at_coruscant.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:df31f670.0207260905.3e36be0e_at_posting.google.com...
> At my company, we are big users of SQL Backtrack for our disaster
> recovery of our Oracle databases (we also use if for Informix, MSSQL,
> Sybase and Oracle NT).
>
> However, we are being forced (from the top) to show hard dollar ROI
> for SQLBT in order to keep it as opposed to switching to RMAN (which
> none of us want to do).
>
> Does anyone have any information on how SQL Backtrack is a better tool
> vs. RMAN. Specifically, how we can realize a return on investment
> using SQLBT, as opposed to using RMAN. It is difficult to do, since
> disaster recovery is sort of like an insurance policy.
>
> Any input would be appreciated,
>
> Thanks!
>
> BTW, we are using Oracle 8.0.5 -> 8.1.7 on Sun and AIX.
Received on Wed Jul 31 2002 - 21:57:58 CEST