Re: L:ist - Can do/do better in MS SQL than Oracle
From: damorgan <damorgan_at_exesolutions.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 00:06:15 GMT
Message-ID: <3CA3AFFA.2FC01177_at_exesolutions.com>
> Not. Sharks are honest, except the consultant type.
> --
> Gerard H. Pille
>
> (The Beatles Reunion is neigh!)
Received on Fri Mar 29 2002 - 01:06:15 CET
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 00:06:15 GMT
Message-ID: <3CA3AFFA.2FC01177_at_exesolutions.com>
I wasn't refering to the fact that they would deny it ... rather the contrary. That they will absolutely, without question, tell you whatever they are selling is just the perfect answer to what you need.
Daniel Morgan
"Gerard H. Pille" wrote:
> damorgan wrote:
> >
> > > > I have got meeting with Oracle consultants and need some points so
> > > > that I can judge whether it is really worth moving to Oracle...
> > >
> > > It'll cost you :-(
> > > >
> >
> > Worth it depends on what you are doing and where you are going.
> >
> > But asking any software company whether you should use their product is like
> > asking a great white shark whether it is a vegetarian.
> >
> > Daniel Morgan
>
> Not. Sharks are honest, except the consultant type.
> --
>
> Gerard H. Pille
>
> (The Beatles Reunion is neigh!)
Received on Fri Mar 29 2002 - 01:06:15 CET