Re: SQL or Java?
From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:45:30 -0000
Message-ID: <3c48431c$0$225$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:45:30 -0000
Message-ID: <3c48431c$0$225$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net>
"Jeff" <jeff_at_work.com> wrote in message
news:a2983b$c19$1_at_cronkite.cc.uga.edu...
> I seriously doubt this. C++ won't increase disk I/O (the real bottleneck
> here) at all. In relational lookups, Oracle's indexing and caching has
the
> advantage... unless we're only talking about a small amount of data (not
my
> impression) that can be completely cached in memory. If C++ programs were
> 100+ times faster at relational database processing (btw, what is Oracle
> written in?), there wouldn't be much point in Oracle's existence, now
would
> there.
C as I recall.
-- Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA Audit Commission UK ***************************************** Please include version and platform and SQL where applicable It makes life easier and increases the likelihood of a good answer ******************************************Received on Fri Jan 18 2002 - 16:45:30 CET