Re: DataBlaze 1.0 Released!!
From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 09:48:27 +0100
Message-ID: <3af26ce3$0$15025$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 09:48:27 +0100
Message-ID: <3af26ce3$0$15025$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net>
Depends what you consider when recommending a product.
One of the things I now have in my mind about this product is that it is developed and marketed by a company that considers spamming an ethical method of marketing. This makes me doubt their business practices in general. The major reason I have never considered AOL is because they bombard me with unwanted discs. Sure if it is the only product that does the job then you'd consider the product, but if there are competitor offerings and the competitor behaves in a more customer centric manner I'd buy from them every time.
Of course the biggest reason not to recommend is that 1.0 version number.
-- Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA Audit Commission UK "wayne" <no_at_email.please.com> wrote in message news:9cqrsl$su9_at_dispatch.concentric.net...Received on Fri May 04 2001 - 10:48:27 CEST
> > And neither will I recommend to my customers that they do if it ever
> > comes up ... and between two of them there are more than 275,000
>
> That's a convincing argument against a product: "Well, I have to recommend
> against it because they cross-posted on the Usenet."
>
>