Re: Oracle 8i for NT work with FAT ?

[Quoted] To follow your arguments one must tell oracle can not work on raw devices because it have no NTFS recover capabilities.

/*it is a fact that NTFS *could* save you from having to recover a database where FAT could not*/

[Quoted]  One more time - NTFS recover capabilities have effect for NTFS FAT catalog, [Quoted] not for files itself.

Please, refer to NT admin guide.

"andrew_webby at hotmail" <spam_at_no.thanks.com> wrote in message news:988019382.14406.0.nnrp-14.c30bdde2_at_news.demon.co.uk...
> While I did think I wouldn't bother responding to someone whose main
> argument is "it's full rubbish" (not the most well reasoned point I've
 ever
> heard...), it is a fact that NTFS *could* save you from having to recover
 a
> database where FAT could not. Surely your vast technical knowledge can
> imagine such a scenario.
>
> Thanks for re-iterating my point about FAT being faster however.
>
> "Andrey" <aakit_at_softhome.net> wrote in message
> news:9br9hs$2k3n$1_at_josh.sovintel.ru...
> > It's full rubbish
> >
> > FAT is much faster
> >
> > NTFS is for file servers, not db servers
> >
> > All what is written about NTFS (recoverable, chains/abandoned clusters
 etc)
> > have no effect on quality of database itself and db files.
>
>
>
Received on Mon Apr 23 2001 - 12:34:21 CEST