Re: ODBC Driver for Personal Oracle 7.2
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 11:48:23 GMT
Message-ID: <bWkv6.23494$992.144875_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au>
[Quoted] I see this as a legitimate channel for people without official support. You [Quoted] keep saying 'We' in your thread, why don't you let the posts continue and let others at least *try* where you refuse to. You cannot possibly think that you know all of the versions available or within reach of the posters to this group. I have v5.2 on floppy and quite a few versions of 6 and 7 on [Quoted] various media. Someone out there *might* just be able to help someone, but you keep chastising new and inexperienced posters based on your own personal [Quoted] experience without giving credit to the boundless resources available within this group.
[Quoted] Can you justify any of your 'We' claims ? Of course not. Go easy on the newbies and do not use the all encompassing 'We' as if you own own/control or direct this group. There are many people out there, through no fault of their own that find themselves without official support, we as group can at [Quoted] least try. It is simple really, if you can't help, don't. Posting that you won't help does nothing to help the poor fellows in need. Do not stand in the way of others who may be wliing and able to help. You have an obnoxious [Quoted] attitude wth newbies and those in need. Show a little compassion.
"Sybrand Bakker" <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote in message news:tbrljjo00km9ae_at_beta-news.demon.nl...
> You don't seem to understand me correctly.
> I said : this is group is no *replacement* for Oracle Technical Support.
> As from the nature of this group we will be almost always be unable to
> resolve official bugs, or we must have run into them ourselves. We would
> also be unable to provide responses on desupported software as most of
using
> are not using those versions themselves anymore, and it is definitely
> impossible to keep track of all the differences.
>
> That said, I also think Oracle Technical Support would provide *better*
> support, and people with a support contract should get in touch with OTS
> instead of posting here, as they are paying for it. If they are not
> satisfied with OTS, they should complain.
> So, I was not using any mandate, it is my opinion, but it looks like you
> wilfully misunderstood me.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sybrand Bakker, Oracle DBA
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Mustapha Nuvvercrap" <hashmanKILLSPAM_at_bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
> news:BYjv6.23293$992.143880_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> > I disagree, this group is perfect for Oracle technical support. Lots of
> > people give technical support here. Lots of people come for technical
> > support. What mandate do you hold to determine the purpose of this group
to
> > not be of a technical support naure ?
> >
> > "Sybrand Bakker" <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote in message
> > news:tbrhhlnjbbijc5_at_beta-news.demon.nl...
> > >
> > > <u98999023_at_spawnkill.ip-mobilphone.net> wrote in message
> > > news:l.985510123.1585113525_at_[213.121.247.208]...
> > > > In The name of GOD
> > > >
> > > > HI, I search for ODBC driver for Personal Oracle 7.2 (Win95)
> > > >
> > > > Can anyone help me?
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Mostafa Kalantar
> > > > smostafak_at_yahoo.co.uk
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sent by smostafak from yahoo subpart from co piece from uk
> > > > This is a spam protected message. Please answer with reference
header.
> > > > Posted via http://www.usenet-replayer.com/cgi/content/new
> > >
> > > First of all, please stop crossposting.
> > > Secondly, you'll need an archeologist to find that particular
software.
> > > Oracle 7 is dead since December 31, 2000, and this group is no
replacement
> > > for Oracle Technical Support, although some seem to think that.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Sybrand Bakker, Oracle DBA
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Sun Mar 25 2001 - 13:48:23 CEST