Re: Which is faster Ado or Oracle classes

[Quoted] Thanks for your reply I found it informative. I'm using the oracle classes like ODatabase, ODynaset and the like if thats what you mean by [Quoted] Oracle Ole for Objects. Is that right?

I took this part of my project over from another programmer who wrote [Quoted] it all in ADO. He was able to call stored procedures by executing a sql [Quoted] command with Begin; call procname; end; . So I must be missing something when you say odbc doesn't deal with stored procedures. Could [Quoted] you expand on that as well ?

In article <9169dh$33spg$6_at_ID-62141.news.dfncis.de>,   "Sybrand Bakker" <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote:
> If you mean Oracle Ole for Objects:
> this is a native driver, which directly interfaces through sqlnet, and
> supports many features not supported by ODBC (communication with
 stored
> procedures for instance). Also OO4O is relatively stable, while
 there are
> no two different ODBC drivers behaving exactly the same. Your app is
> definitely going to be more reliable as your are not dependent from
 all kind
> of ODBC drivers people might already have on their system.
>
> Hth,
> Sybrand Bakker, Oracle DBA
>
> <fuckingstupid_at_my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:9160o2$5g$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com...
> > I was using ADO but was playing around with the oracle classes
> > (oconnect etc etc) , I'm wondering which is faster.
> >
> > I'm thinking the classes are because ado is using ODBC and has to go
> > thru all that. I'm not sure how oracle is doing it , probably rpcs
 in
> > their lib.
> >
> > I might have to explain to my boss why I changed from ado to oracle
> > classes.
> >
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com
> > http://www.deja.com/
>
>

Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/ Received on Wed Dec 13 2000 - 00:15:02 CET