Re: Anyone have experience with Designer 1.3.2 on Win95?

From: Frank van Bortel <fbortel_at_home.nl>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 19:53:41 GMT
Message-ID: <3A2FEAA7.DE044603_at_home.nl>


But it *is* on NT4! - go for that!
More stability (hey! - did I say stable? - no, I said more...), the ability to generate both 16 and 32 bit (like W95). Support could have told you...

hhultink_at_my-deja.com wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am currently making the specifications for a
> new workstation. In 2001 we will migrate from
> Oracle 7.3.4 and Designer/2000 1.3.2 to
> (probably) Oracle 8i and Designer 6i.
> But because we support an application for 15
> customers, we will have a span of time where we
> will have to use both versions paralell. I don't
> want to use Win95 anymore, it just isn't stable
> enough. But Designer 1.3.2 is not supported or
> certified on either Win98 or Win2000.
> Of course this doesn't mean that it won't work.
> Does anyone have experience with Designer 1.3.2
> on Win98/2000? Is it stable? Does it work?
> Any comments will be appreciated.
>
> --
> Henk Hultink
>
> Stoas Wageningen
> "Activating Knowledge"
> hhu_at_nospam.stoas.nl
> for e-mail remove the nospam-filter
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.

--
Gtrz,

Frank van Bortel
Received on Thu Dec 07 2000 - 20:53:41 CET

Original text of this message