Re: Sequence

From: Mike Dwyer <dwyermj_at_co,larimer.co.us>
Date: 2000/04/26
Message-ID: <sSDN4.1$Vk.355_at_wdc-read-01.qwest.net>#1/1


A trigger is absolutely required. You cannot guarantee that a sequence will provide such montony.

[BTW, PMI (pardon my ignorance), but what is PMFJI? TIA (10q)]

"Robert Wagner" <RobertWagner_at_alum.mit.edu> wrote in message news:bGoN4.3721$J81.27615_at_newsr1.maine.rr.com...
> In part, "Connor McDonald" <connor_mcdonald_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:38D60357.338F_at_yahoo.com...
> > Unless you absolutely must have consecutive numbers I wouldn't worry
> > about it - sequences are designed for a unique numbers not necessarily a
> > monotonically increasing set.
>
> PMFJI, but would you prefer a trigger where a monitonically increasing set
> IS required?
>
>
Received on Wed Apr 26 2000 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message